Skip to main content

Two Weeks Is Sometimes All You Get — Presence, Regret, and Staying Until the End

 

There is a quiet urgency running beneath 2 Weeks in theDesert With Dad that never announces itself outright. It doesn’t come in the form of countdowns or dramatic warnings. It sits there in the background, growing heavier with each passing day. The reader knows, even when the characters don’t say it out loud, that time is short.

Tom Sauer’s father is in his mid-eighties. He has survived cancers that should have taken him. He lives with physical limitations, mental rigidity, and a constant fear of being alone. This trip to Sun City, Arizona, is not officially framed as a farewell, but everyone involved understands that it might be the last time. That understanding changes everything, even when no one acknowledges it directly.

What makes the book honest is that Sauer doesn’t suddenly become sentimental because of this reality. He doesn’t soften his father. He doesn’t rewrite their history. Instead, he documents what it actually looks like to spend time with someone near the end of their life when the relationship has always been complicated.

The days are filled with problems. Not symbolic problems. Real ones. Broken systems. Medical scares. Financial arguments. Small irritations that feel larger because there is no escape from them. Sauer is there constantly, managing, reacting, adjusting. There is no break. No neutral space. The desert house becomes a pressure cooker where every habit, belief, and frustration surfaces.

And yet, this is also where presence becomes unavoidable.

Sauer cannot disappear into his own life. He cannot keep distance. He cannot avoid his father’s worldview. For two weeks, he is fully immersed. That immersion forces him to see things clearly—not just his father’s flaws, but his own responses to them.

There are moments when Sauer reflects on how little time they actually spent together earlier in life. Work, distance, schedules, discomfort—all the usual reasons adult children use to justify staying away. None of those reasons feel very strong anymore when the opportunity to visit is slipping away for good.

The Arizona house itself becomes symbolic without trying to be. It is full of objects frozen in place, untouched by time because change would require spending money. In many ways, Sauer’s father is the same. He built his life around survival and never moved past it. The house reflects that stasis. Nothing evolves. Nothing softens. Everything is preserved, even when preservation becomes a burden.

Sauer doesn’t argue against this philosophy anymore. He observes it. He navigates around it. He accepts that persuasion is pointless. This acceptance doesn’t mean approval. It means realism.

Health looms large as the trip continues. Sauer’s father experiences blood in his urine, a reminder that his body is fragile and unpredictable. The response is not panic, but irritation. Medical systems are mistrusted. Pills are questioned. Doctors are seen as intrusions. Even illness is framed as another attempt by the world to take money.

Sauer handles these moments quietly. He doesn’t escalate. He doesn’t force fear or gratitude where they don’t exist. He stays calm because he has learned that calm is the only thing that keeps the day moving forward.

One of the most striking aspects of the book is Sauer’s refusal to turn himself into the hero of the story. He admits when he is tired. He admits when he is frustrated. He admits when he chooses silence over confrontation simply because he doesn’t have the energy to fight another battle.

This honesty makes the book feel lived-in rather than written.

The past drifts in and out of the present without warning. Sauer reflects on his upbringing, on a father who provided materially but struggled emotionally. Encouragement was limited. Support for creative interests was nonexistent. Expectations were rigid. Those early experiences never fully resolved, and Sauer doesn’t pretend they did.

Instead, he shows how those unresolved feelings coexist with responsibility. Caring for an aging parent does not erase old wounds. It often reopens them. Sauer doesn’t dramatize this. He allows it to exist quietly alongside everything else.

There are moments of humor that cut through the heaviness. They are not planned. They appear unexpectedly, usually born out of absurdity. A stubborn car that refuses to die. A sarcastic comment that turns into a running joke. A middle finger raised playfully for photos. These moments don’t redeem the situation. They humanize it.

As the trip nears its end, nothing resolves neatly. The house is still problematic. The fears are still present. The worldview remains unchanged. What has changed is Sauer’s understanding of what this time was actually for.

It wasn’t about fixing anything. It wasn’t about convincing his father to live differently. It wasn’t about healing the past. It was about being there while he still could.

That realization carries weight because it removes pressure. Sauer no longer has to achieve something meaningful during these two weeks. Simply showing up becomes enough. Staying becomes the point.

This is where the book quietly lands its strongest message without ever stating it directly: you don’t always get closure. Sometimes you only get time. And sometimes that time is uncomfortable, exhausting, and unsatisfying—but it still matters.

Sauer’s father eventually passes not long after the period documented in the book. Knowing this doesn’t make the story tragic. It makes it complete. These two weeks were not extraordinary because of what changed. They were extraordinary because they happened at all.

For readers, especially those with aging parents, this final realization lingers. There is no guarantee of another visit. No guarantee of improvement. No guarantee of resolution. What exists is the choice to be present or absent.

2 Weeks in the Desert With Dad doesn’t promise peace at the end of caregiving. It offers something more honest: the chance to say you stayed. You didn’t run. You didn’t look away. You bore witness to someone exactly as they were, even when it was hard.

Sometimes that has to be enough.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Azalea: Part 1 - From Dream to Nightmare: A Dark Fantasy Tale of Trauma, Duty, and Redemption

  A gripping new dark fantasy novel challenges the myth of the invincible hero, delving into the psychological cost of power, survival, and unrelenting duty in a world consumed by war. In a genre long dominated by fearless champions and triumphant victories, Benjamin Fletcher’s Azalea: Part 1 - From Dream to Nightmare offers a starkly different vision of heroism, forged by trauma, fractured identity, and the relentless weight of responsibility. Set in the war-torn world of Ortus, this dark fantasy novel focuses not on glory but on endurance, asking what happens when the hero survives long enough for the cost to matter. At the center of the story is Joseph Alcadeias, a human ranger and mystic who becomes a legendary dragon slayer, his name synonymous with hope and fear, and Azalea, a sylvan mesmer who becomes his bonded partner. To the world, Joseph is a living weapon, a symbol of resistance against dragons and the darkness threatening civilization. To himself, he is something ...

New Christian Children’s Coloring Book Offers a Gentle Way to Learn Faith

  Wendy Baschuk's After the Flood: A-Color-It Yourself Book is a Christian children’s book that combines faith, creativity, and simple learning. The book is a calm and fun way for kids to learn about God's love while doing something they already enjoy… coloring. The book allows children to read a gentle story about faith and color the pictures as they go. This interactive style helps kids slow down, pay attention, and really connect with the message. Children don't rush through the story; instead, they think about it as they color each page. Wendy Baschuk wrote the book with children and families in mind. She knows how to teach kids because she has been doing it for years. She wanted to write a book that children of all ages would find welcoming, easy to understand, and fun to read. The book After the Flood uses simple words and a calm voice. The story doesn't use hard words or complicated ideas, so it's good for kids. The message is about faith, love, and g...

From Shakespeare to Smut: The Literary Mischief of Naughty Bits

  At first encounter, Naughty Bits: Ten Short Plays About Sex can feel like an act of joyful vandalism—classical forms defaced with obscenity, lofty language dragged gleefully through the gutter. But look closer, and it becomes clear that this is no careless provocation. Beneath the explicit humor and deliberate bad behavior lies a deep affection for literature, theatre, and the power of language itself. Naughty Bits is not an attack on high culture; it’s a mischievous conversation with it. Playwright William Andrew Jones draws freely from centuries of literary tradition, borrowing the rhythms, references, and structures of canonical works—and then gleefully twisting them. The result is a collection that feels both intellectually literate and shamelessly crude, where Shakespeare rubs shoulders with smut and philosophy collides with profanity. This collision is not accidental. It is the engine that drives the book . A Long Tradition of Dirty Classics Contrary to modern assump...